Oct 15 2010

The Hybrid “DSLR” — One Camera Type With Many Names

Category: Multimedia & Video, Technology Insights, ViewpointEthan G. Salwen @ 5:26 pm

AfterCapture Blog_101015_DSLR Naming 2_1Silly me! There I thought that a DSLR that captures video must have one simple, standard name, and that I just didn’t know what it is. Thus my post on the topic in which I look at the overlapping use of “HDSLR,” “HD DSLR” and “DSLR video.” The comments I received from a number of savvy photographers made it clear that one simple, standard name does not exist, and that it might be better that way, at least for now.

Tony Wu wrote that “The discussion/debate never crossed my mind,” and he isn’t too worried about the question. Eric Chen wrote that the question is an “outdated discussion,” as nearly every DSLR captures video, and “it would be suicide for someone to produce a new SLR that isn’t ‘D’ or ‘HD’ or ‘ViD.’” His suggestion: “Drop the silly prefixes! I just use ‘SLR.’”

Ian Shive seems to agree about dropping prefixes, except to perhaps add an “F” to film SLRS — as in FSLR — and thereby making it clear that an SLR that is called an SLR is really a DSLR. Interesting idea.

“Let’s call it what it is; a VSLR,” wrote Ralph Clevenger. “A video single lens reflex camera, or video-capable single lens reflex.” Not only does this make the most sense, Clevenger believes, but he also notes that it rolls of the tongue real nice. In an email to me said that Brooks Institute, where he teaches, will be adopting this name. The VSLR. It does roll off the tongue nicely, and Clevenger makes good sense, but could there be a risk to insisting (as I was) that there must be one label when one label does not exist?

Richard Anderson (who likes “DSLR” and thinks, like Richard Harrington and PhotoCineNews, that it is best to simply talk about “DSLR video”, for clarity and avoiding additional prefixes) points out that “When it comes to terminology, there is no single George Bush-like ‘decider’”, and notes that “as soon as DP Review starts a forum called ‘HDSLR’ or ‘Video SLR,’ then the term will start to congeal.”

Before “It” Congeals

It seems clear that sooner than later all photographers (not working with antiques) will be using SLRs that are DSLRs and that all DSLRs will capture video and sound. Therefore, it seems possible (and sensible?) that SLRs that happen to be D (or V or H or HD) will come to be know simply as SLRs. This would be nice. But, of cousre, another term might congeal as a set standard. Who knows, but in the meantime I suggest:

#1: Don’t think about this topic as much as I have! As Gail Mooney puts it: “I’m much more interested in what the camera does [sic] than what it’s called.” In other words, she’s using her DSLR (or whatever it’s called) rather than debating about what to call it. Good for her!

#2: Consider what name makes sense to you, and stick by it. I still believe that professionalism and calling things by their best names go hand and hand. With this post and my previous one on this topic you are more than equipped to make a quick, intelligent naming decision for yourself.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,


Apr 23 2010

Wonderful Possiblities in “Photographing Nature”

Category: BooksEthan G. Salwen @ 4:11 pm

AfterCapture Blog_100423_Photographing Nature_1It’s been a long time since I have read a book on photography that has left me so pleased, satisfied and eager to spread the word about it. Having just finished “Photographing Nature,” I find myself downright giddy, which is a reaction I definitely an emotion I have never felt in relation to a book covering photographic techniques. Written by the nature photographer Ralph A. Clevenger, “Photographing Nature” is brilliantly conceived and executed, proving deeply insightful on the most difficult topics of photography to cover — the basics. Clevenger’s voice, uniquely lucid and inspiring, stands out sharply in the din that is the increasing numbers of photographers attempting to share their knowledge.

The fact that “Photographing Nature” is (obviously) about photographing nature makes my enthusiastic response all the more meaningful. Birds, bears and brilliant landscapes simply are not my photographic cup of tea — at least in terms of what I chose to photograph. However, although Clevenger has focused on illuminating the fundamentals of nature photography, he does so with such success that “Photographing Nature” offers tremendous value to an extremely wide range of photographers dedicated to improving their craft — from newbies seeking Photography 101 resources unrelated to nature photography to pros needing a boost of inspiration.

AfterCapture Blog_100423_Photographing Nature_5

The subtitle of “Photographing Nature” is “A photo workshop from Brooks Institute’s top nature photography instructor.” While “workshop” might be a good word to use for marketing it does not suggest the full scope of Clevenger’s book. Clevenger definitely has a way of inviting photographers to take action, learning through a handful of specific assignments he suggests. But ultimately this is a stellar book covering conceptual underpinnings and technical specifics related to any photographic specialities. Clevenger’s unwavering focus on nature adds value to “Photographing Nature,” but considering the universal appeal of this book it might have been more appropriate to title it “The Nature of How To Photograph.”

Continue reading “Wonderful Possiblities in “Photographing Nature””

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,


Feb 13 2009

Burn Down the Utterly Useless Photo Schools!

Category: ViewpointEthan G. Salwen @ 11:43 am

ACMF_NG_015So, as a community of photographers dedicated to the health of community, what do we do about the fact that photography schools are utterly useless? Personally, I think we should stop the insanity. How? Simple. Let’s all head to the nearest photography school, poor a few thousand gallons of gas on it, and then flick a match on the out-dated, out-of touch institution.

No, no, I’m not an anarchist, and I certainly don’t want anyone to get hurt. But, it’s not an exaggeration to say that people are getting hurt by being lead to believe that professional photography skills are best learned in a photography school.

Wiping out photography schools would invigorate the entire community. Only two backwards-thinking groups of people would Continue reading “Burn Down the Utterly Useless Photo Schools!”

Tags: , , ,


Feb 09 2009

Photography Schools are Utterly Useless

Category: ViewpointEthan G. Salwen @ 11:38 am

ACMF_NG_013This one goes out to all of you who are considering going to a photography school. Also, just as important, to all of you who get asked for advice about attending one. I’m also reaching out to all of you who care about the health of the image-making industry as a whole.

My message is the fact is that we need to destroy photography schools, which are utterly useless, totally out-of-date and totally out-of-touch institutions.

The simple fact is that photography schools Continue reading “Photography Schools are Utterly Useless”

Tags: , , ,